대학 수학 능력 시험 심화 영어 – 읽기 매칭 – 문화와 예술. Reading matching matura rozszerzona. 긴, 밀집된 텍스트에서 방해 요소와 혼란을 가득 담고 있는 패러프레이즈 찾기 연습 (레벨 B2+/C1).
작업 1 / 5
1. Przeczytaj tekst i wybierz stwierdzenie, które najlepiej go podsumowuje.
The fierce controversy surrounding contemporary, avant-garde art often stems directly from its profound and unapologetic detachment from traditional, classical aesthetics. Conservative viewers, expecting to see flawless technical mastery and easily recognizable, beautiful forms, frequently feel alienated and intellectually mocked by abstract installations that prioritize underlying, complex conceptual philosophy over immediate, superficial visual appeal.
The fierce controversy surrounding contemporary, avant-garde art often stems directly from its profound and unapologetic detachment from traditional, classical aesthetics. Conservative viewers, expecting to see flawless technical mastery and easily recognizable, beautiful forms, frequently feel alienated and intellectually mocked by abstract installations that prioritize underlying, complex conceptual philosophy over immediate, superficial visual appeal.
작업 2 / 5
2. 읽어보시고 가장 잘 요약하는 진술을 선택하세요.
Adapting globally beloved, monumental literary classics into high-budget Hollywood blockbuster films is a notoriously perilous and stressful endeavor. Visionary directors must meticulously and constantly balance the aggressive commercial demands of modern cinema studios with the passionate, uncompromising expectations of devoted readers—a delicate compromise that very rarely satisfies the most purist, demanding literary critics.
Adapting globally beloved, monumental literary classics into high-budget Hollywood blockbuster films is a notoriously perilous and stressful endeavor. Visionary directors must meticulously and constantly balance the aggressive commercial demands of modern cinema studios with the passionate, uncompromising expectations of devoted readers—a delicate compromise that very rarely satisfies the most purist, demanding literary critics.
작업 3 / 5
3. Przeczytaj tekst i wybierz stwierdzenie, które najlepiej go podsumowuje.
Street art, once universally dismissed and fiercely prosecuted by authorities as mere criminal vandalism, has gradually achieved legitimate, widespread cultural recognition over the last decade. Stunning, thought-provoking murals that formerly provoked immediate police intervention are now highly protected by enlightened city councils, officially celebrated as vibrant, indispensable expressions of authentic, grassroots urban identity.
Street art, once universally dismissed and fiercely prosecuted by authorities as mere criminal vandalism, has gradually achieved legitimate, widespread cultural recognition over the last decade. Stunning, thought-provoking murals that formerly provoked immediate police intervention are now highly protected by enlightened city councils, officially celebrated as vibrant, indispensable expressions of authentic, grassroots urban identity.
작업 4 / 5
4. Przeczytaj tekst i wybierz stwierdzenie, które najlepiej go podsumowuje.
The rapid digitalization of music distribution entirely and irreversibly dismantled the traditional, highly lucrative revenue models of massive, monopolistic record labels. Independent 아티ści, who were previously wholly reliant on the approval of corporate gatekeepers to release their tracks, can now easily reach global audiences directly through streaming platforms, fundamentally democratizing the once exclusive 음악 산업.
The rapid digitalization of music distribution entirely and irreversibly dismantled the traditional, highly lucrative revenue models of massive, monopolistic record labels. Independent 아티ści, who were previously wholly reliant on the approval of corporate gatekeepers to release their tracks, can now easily reach global audiences directly through streaming platforms, fundamentally democratizing the once exclusive 음악 산업.
작업 5 / 5
5. Przeczytaj tekst i wybierz stwierdzenie, które najlepiej go podsumowuje.
문학에서의 검열은 종종 정치인들에 의해 취약한 사회 도덕성을 보호하기 위한 필요 수단으로 공개적으로 정당화되지만, 본질적으로 기본적인 지적 자유를 억압합니다. 논란이 되고 도발적인 책에 대한 접근을 완전히 제한함으로써, 당국은 시민들에게 현상 유지에 도전하는 다양한 관점과 잠재적으로 도전적인 관점을 비판적으로 검토할 수 있는 중요한, 대체 불가능한 기회를 박탈합니다.
문학에서의 검열은 종종 정치인들에 의해 취약한 사회 도덕성을 보호하기 위한 필요 수단으로 공개적으로 정당화되지만, 본질적으로 기본적인 지적 자유를 억압합니다. 논란이 되고 도발적인 책에 대한 접근을 완전히 제한함으로써, 당국은 시민들에게 현상 유지에 도전하는 다양한 관점과 잠재적으로 도전적인 관점을 비판적으로 검토할 수 있는 중요한, 대체 불가능한 기회를 박탈합니다.